|
Top of the Agenda: NATO Airstrike
A NATO airstrike (Pajhwok) this morning hit fuel tankers that had been hijacked last night by insurgents in Kunduz province in northern Afghanistan. Afghan officials said more than ninety people were killed, some forty of which were civilians (Guardan).
The Telegraph reports villagers were gathered around one of the tankers, which was stuck in a river, to get cooking oil when it was bombed. A spokesperson for the International Security Assistance Force said a commander called in the strikes "after observing that only insurgents were in the area," but said reports of civilian deaths are being investigated (Reuters).
Separately, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates defended U.S. military strategy in Afghanistan (Christian Science Monitor), days after Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. military official in the country, called for sweeping strategic changes. Speaking at the Pentagon, Gates said he does not believe (VOA) "the war is slipping through the administration's fingers."
Analysis
Kabul-based analyst John Dempsey tells CFR that U.S. officials should be prepared to commit more military and civilian resources to stave off resurgent Taliban forces.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, CFR's Dan Senor and the Ethics and Public Policy Center's Peter Wehner express concern over a "neo-isolationist outlook" among conservatives calling for withdrawal from Afghanistan.
CFR's Max Boot writes that the war cannot be fought from "offshore" as some commentators have argued. He says any sign of U.S. wavering in commitment to the war effort will send a signal to Pakistan that "their old strategy of cutting deals with Islamic militants is more necessary than ever."
Background
Global Post reports on allegations that United States Agency for International Development funds are being funneled to the Taliban.
An interactive CFR timeline chronicles the war in Afghanistan.
|